intertribal: (Default)
I recognize the value of legislatures.  I truly do.

But goddamn, legislators are dumb.

"Another difficulty was that key Congressmen, whose support would have been necessary for the passage of any loan, quickly made it clear that they would demand in return nothing less than free elections and freedom of speech inside the Soviet Union, and the abandonment of its sphere of influence in Eastern Europe." 

Yes, Congressmen.  The USSR in 1945 will definitely democratize and liberalize their Communist dictatorship and agree to not expand their influence in exchange for a loan.  A loan that the Russians "were never dependent enough" to need.  I'm not a fan of realist logic but this mentality defies common sense.  It actually frightens me that senators become presidents. 

---

Also, you can learn a surprising amount about foreign relations from watching G's to Gents.  International relations ("how are we an alliance?"), balance of power ("it's time to break the alliance"), domestic pressure ("baby mama's pregnant, I got bills to pay"), economic considerations ("how you gonna get the money?  you gonna rob it?"), security ("I'm a dead man walking"), norms ("you cannot lick at another man").  In spite of it really being from Slaves to Slaveowners, I must admit to a real fondness for this show.  Plus it's one of the few reality shows that objectifies men and deals with norms of masculinity as opposed to norms of femininity.  Yeah, it objectifies ghetto men.  But it's a start. 

Lank: You faked being thug just to be here!
Mito: I faked being in prison?!
Lank: What the fuck does prison have to do with shit?!
Mito: It has everything to do with why I'm here!
intertribal: (watch the band through a bunch of dancer)
Timothy Egan is a dumb ass, and it makes me sad that his little logo is a cowboy (he's not even in cowboy country!  he's in Seattle!).  The gist of his column today (stop using young and stupid as an excuse) was his most obvious, like-duuhhhh-inducing yet, but his examples pissed me off.

 Whoooaaa, A-Rod. Stop the tape. For the record, he was pumped up on steroids and other drugs from ages 26 through 28, while the highest-paid player in baseball, with a 10-year, $252 million contract.

He was a man in full, but wants us to think of him as a boy. He was a corporation unto himself, a very calculated one at that. He cheated to get an edge. Then he lied about it.

If anyone deserves a young and stupid pass it’s Michael Phelps, the Olympic swimmer who was caught in a pose not unknown to anyone his age — snout inside a bong.

Phelps seemed contrite in trotting out his young and stupid defense. “I’m 23 years old and despite the successes I’ve had in the pool, I acted in a youthful and inappropriate way,” he said.

More like youthful and appropriate. I have a hard time going after him for taking a hit of pot after he spent most of his life as a robo-athlete.

Now I have an unusual view of the whole drugs-in-sports thing.  Cheating doesn't upset me very much.  I don't hate Lance Armstrong because he supposedly used performance-enhancing creams, or whatever - I hate him because he left his wife, who had stood by him through cancer, started dating Sheryl Crow, broke up with her when she got cancer, dated Ashley Olsen, then Kate Hudson, and now has some other chick pregnant (all, and I mean all, blondes).  Using performance-enhancing drugs, in my opinion, is a problem that goes way beyond personality flaws, beyond some lust for bodily perfection, monetary greed, or trophies.  It speaks to the way we treat sports as a culture.  We expect perfection and get mad when they lose.  The athlete hears that winning is everything, winning at all costs, win win win or no one will love you, and as the pressure builds they turn to pills.  Then we pull back with these puritan gasps - "oh no, we didn't mean that!" See Doug Glanville's column for a first-hand account of A-Rod's journey through steroid land.  If we're going to get upset that they're on steroids, we need to get upset with students who take prescription pills - or drink coffee - to get their work done.  We need to get mad at our own government for putting soldiers on God knows what to get them to kill better during wars.  And why stop there?  What about the people on meds to work through chronic pain?  They're just trying to fulfill expectations too. 

The illusion of "tainting the sport" is even more pathetic.  Sports are already tainted past the point of recognition, not even by drugs but by powerful donors, millions of dollars, advertising campaigns, vastly unequal training facilities, ridiculous media attention, the fact that the NBA is now scouting for players in junior high schools... I could go on and on.  The search for purity, for this holy sport as American as apple pie, is a wild goose chase and nothing more.  And sports are tainted because we want them that way.  We like hype.  We want it bigger, better, and more confrontational, like Alien Vs. Predator. 

Usually when Timothy Egan is a dumb ass everyone calls him out on it, but this time everyone's all "clap your hands say yeah", which I presume is because everyone in this country except me and Lucia are obsessed with Michael Phucking Phelps.  Seriously, I have always hated this douchebag.  Look at him.  He fails the douchebag test.  I refused to watch most of the Olympics because of him.  The fact that he took pot, well, who on the New York Times is going to get mad about that?  As long as drugs are for fun, they make you cool!  It's when you take them in order to live up to ridiculous expectations of an unstable fanbase that you become "evil", a slave to the man... as well as imperfect and incapable of winning as a "robo-athlete", on the virtue of your God-given DNA.  Phelps is everything the fanbase wants, isn't he?  Not only talented beyond the point of what should be called grotesque (hey, he's no Federer, he's no Baryshnikov, he's a compilation of muscles repeating the same action over and over - which is why I don't give much of a shit about swimming), but funPopular.  He parties.  He's chill, man, doesn't have a stick up his ass.  He's just a normal kid, smashing mailboxes and tipping cows and getting DUIs and chasing skirt.  As much as sports commentators salivate over the religious missionaries in athletics, let's be honest: if Tim Tebow didn't have pictures with hot girls, would people like him as much?  Hey, it's not like we want a fuckin' Mormon as our national idol, you know what I mean?  We're red-blooded Americans!  We need proof of their youthful vigor and manly virility, to sort of quote Teddy Roosevelt, who's apparently one of our most popular presidents.  Boys will be boys!  If not, what are they... gay? 

Losers? 

We may be all about the bootstraps in America, but if you don't know how to have a good time (wink wink) there's something wrong with you.  So be both, athletes.  Be the hard-working, supremely talented, totally fair, party animal student-athlete who scores with all the girls (just like, you know, America, the anti-colonial imperialist?  or rather, just like "America", because we are so not as hot as we think we are).  Be perfect.  Okay?  The whole country's counting on you. 

I feel worse for the athlete (not necessarily A-Rod, but say, a college athlete) that doesn't have Phelps' natural talent and slaves and slaves at training camp and never gets the praise that his "better-endowed" teammates get, and so takes steroids, gets called out on it, and is made a public pariah for people to throw tomatoes at.  I don't feel bad for an overprivileged Adonis dickwad who takes drugs purely to party. 
intertribal: (Default)
blue hair aside, this video basically makes my life. I mean, it has everything I like in life! [only kidding]


"Be A Man" - Hole


The only boy I understand: the one ashamed to be a man
Just rape the world because you can, that's what it takes to be a man
Knock her up, slap her hand, prove it to me, just be a man
I think I can, I think I can, I'm big enough to be a man
Tell you the truth, I'm jealous yeah, give anything to be a man...
Be a man, so impotent, be a man
Take off your dress, your master plan, give anything, just be a man
Oh cut it off, of course you can, got what it takes to be a man
Oh rape us all just 'cause you can, well give it up, just be a man
Your fucking war, the carnage yeah, give anything to be a man
Cut it off, I know you can, 'cause no one cares if you're a man
Be a man, so impotent, be a man
Can't get it up? I understand... under the gun to be a man...
I think I can, I think I can, I'm big enough to be a man!
I fuck the world, because I can, I'm everything, oh be a man
I fuck the world, because I can, give anything, be a man
I'm potent yeah!!!

$#$#$#

WTF DO NOT WANT - "Hello there :D I just watched The Hills Have Eyes for the first time a few days ago, and now I'm really into it... I'm a typical fangirl who yanks innocent characters out of movies/series and plops them into pairings, and as I was watching the end of the movie the pairing Lizard/Doug popped into my head."

$#$#$#

[01] -- Look up FIVE of your favorite movies on IMDB.
[02] -- Click the "trivia" link in the sidebar.
[03] -- Post a fun and random bit of trivia from each film.

whee! )

yeah, first lines of 15 songs on shuffle, blah blah blah.

tell me what's the word )

last lines of next 15 songs on shuffle!


word up! )
intertribal: (parking lot)
I think a lot of fandom really hates women.  Fangirls are especially rabid.  It should come as no surprise that the more delusional ones hate the women their beloved men have been written into marrying - but I must admit, I did not expect these fangirls' solution to be eliminating women entirely.  I expected them to craft better, more perfect women as replacements - oh no.  Women have lost their right to be associated with men, for they are stupid, cruel creatures, white sepulchers. 

See: An Empire Reborn, a story by this chick (loves Brokeback Mountain!*  Surprise!  hates the fandom's main female character!  Surprise!).  When a story comes with this kind of disclaimer -
"The depiction of abortion by the characters in this story does not reflect the author’s political attitudes toward the procedure. The sole intention is to create an interesting conflict between the characters and pave the way for a male/male relationship between the two main characters. No offense is intended towards those in favor of the practice or towards women who have gotten abortions"
- I should have known not to read it.  Well, I read it anyway, because I wanted to see if I was right, and I was right.

The story, by the way, uses phrases like "They can have you torn limb from limb and sucked out of the womb in pieces".  And "slaughter". 

Oh my god you guys.  Women kill babies.  Women are teh evil.  Men are noble!  Men = LOVE. 
[caveat: the only good women are women who carry their babies to term, and if they
really don't want the adorable little suckers, give them away to a deserving but infertile rich couple, like in Juno!]

Reminds me of my 9th-grade English teacher explaining our school mascots (the Spartans) to us: "Women were considered inferior.  They were only there to produce children.  For men, real relationships could only be had with men, who were their intellectual equals."  (paraphrased, obviously - although it forbade me from ever taking a movie like 300 seriously, and made the fact that wrestling was so popular among the boys of our school hilarious as hell)

So while I was mulling over the question of why so many fangirls hate female characters (and yet do not seem to hate themselves, and will in fact sometimes place themselves into their stories, if anything to end up with the only male character that they like, whom they will allow to be heterosexual.), and find the female characters "unworthy" of their canon husbands, this song came on:

"Peron's Latest Flame".  Change "Peron" to any male character with a canon girlfriend/wife, and you've got the fangirl's theme song.
[Che:] Could there be in our fighting corps a lack of enthusiasm for
[Army:] Exactly!
[Che:] Peron's latest flame?
[Army:] You said it brother!

[Che:]  Should you wish to cause great distress in the tidiest officer's mess, just mention her name

[Army:]  That isn't funny!
Peron is a fool, breaking every taboo, installing a girl in the army H.Q. - and she's an actress, the last straw!
Her only good parts are between her thighs, she should stare at the ceiling, not reach for the skies
Or she could be his last whore
The evidence suggests she has other interests
If it's her who's using him, he's exceptionally dim
Bitch!  Dangerous Jade!

She should get into her head, she should not get out of bed
She should know that she's not paid to be loud but to be laid
Slut!  Dangerous Jade!
Man, I love misogynists.  Especially when they're female.  I'm going to go watch Embodiment of Fire now.  Peace.

* - I too liked Brokeback Mountain.  I do not, however, fetishize it.
intertribal: (out comes the evil)
Stephen King's words are actually the only ones I remember, although other authors spin better stories in better ways, overall. 

[some are phrases, some are just words.]

The Shining:  "redrum"
It:  "He thrusts his fists against the posts and still insists he sees the ghosts"
Storm of the Century:  "give me what I want and I'll go away" and "my name is legion, for we are many" [which is biblical, I know, but Stephen King introduced it to me]
The Nightflier:  "Dwight Renfield... flew in from Derry... nice fella... different... said he was flying out tonight... said he'd stop to say goodbye."
Jerusalem's Lot:  "there are SOME rats in these walls!"
Dreamcatcher:  "same shit, different day." [SSDD for short]
Pet Sematary"the ground there is stonier than a man's heart" and "sometimes, death is a blessing."

My mother had a slasher moment today, by accident.  We were at an Indian restaurant and we looked up at a tapestry and she said, "Oh, it's... Rama and Krishna, right?"  And then rapidly corrected herself: "Rama and Sita, I mean."  It made me wonder if yaoi fangirls (some of my friends have worse terms for them) ever ship mythological figures... some of them, Krishna in particular, seem like they could be bisexual.  I'm guessing not.  I suppose that would be boring... or perhaps, they are just not hot enough, those deities.

intertribal: (carrie)
Your Musical Tastes Match: Nicole Kidman


My mother always wants to listen to my iPod when we're driving in the car at home.  Granted, so do I.  It beats the radio.  But my current obsessions near home-time are always songs that I just know will scare her.  Last time it was Scarling songs and "Fuck the Pain Away".  Those didn't go over so well.  This time it's Hole songs and "Noir Desir" (Vive La Fete), which actually turns into hard-core screaming at the end.  But I like them for their intensity, their scariness.  Because I feel like screaming so often, even when I'm happy.  Just listening to Els Pynoo makes me want to buckle over and scream, with ecstatic rage.  Of course I'm sure my neighbors think that I'm being murdered.  (Or they would, if they weren't always hammering nails into the wall they share with me.  They're constantly renovating, those two.)

I'm contemplating separating out the songs that will potentially scare my mother, or make her cringe, from my frequently used playlists and putting them into their own category: Danger, Danger, High Voltage.  But is it really being honest if I let her listen to the playlist that describes "me" and I censor some of the songs?  (do I think too much?)  I used to never let my mother listen to my music at all.  We diverged after we moved to the States, because I got more into pop than I was in elementary school, when all I had was Asia Hit List for two hours on Saturdays (I rooted for the Spice Girls, and secretly, for Madonna and Jewel).  Before we listened to Broadway as a family - Les Miserables, Evita, The Phantom of the Opera.  And some Disney: The Lion King, Beauty and the Beast, The Hunchback of Notre Dame.  Pop came and screwed that all up.  I think she criticized, or ridiculed, something I listened to once in middle school, and I never let her hear anything I liked again.  I suppose that's somewhat a good thing.  It spared her "Closer" (Nine Inch Nails) and Meteora (Linkin Park) - both of which I still listen to on occasion, but they're hardly a staple of my audio diet.  Then my music collection exploded in college and I got an iPod and suddenly my mom's praising Coldplay and demanding to hear more new music, and it's cool when she likes it, but terrifying when she doesn't.  Terrifying, hurtful, the works.  I consider my mother's taste sophisticated and learned, maybe that's why.  Or maybe because I think: if she likes it and I like it, it's crossed generations, and it must be truly good.  I don't want to know that my mother thinks my taste is trash.  I want her to love what I love.  And when she says nothing in response to songs that are soul-resounding to me, like "Running Up That Hill" (Placebo), I feel like there's this void between us, or the song's not as good as I think it is.  Sometimes I just accept that my mother has taste-problems.  For instance, she's allergic to country, the same way she's repulsed by lima beans.  She can't handle "Walk the Line" - not even sung by Johnny Cash but by Joaquin Phoenix.  But when she says she appreciates songs for their complex rhythms, like "Ways and Means" (Snow Patrol), doesn't that mean the ones she doesn't appreciate are simplistic?  And then I feel the need to explain myself, why I have such a ridiculous attachment to that song, and I just get frantic and use abstract hyperbole, usually, and I end up sounding as moronic as my song. 

For some reason I'm more paranoid and protective with my screaming girls than my screaming boys.  I don't take the boys as seriously, perhaps.  Rammstein and Korn are both pretty funny, if you think about it.  But the girls - I can relate to them and their complaints (even when I don't speak their language).  They dig in my stomach - Courtney and Shirley and Els and Jessicka (and Tori, too).  And for some reason they're the ones that my mother is more likely to not be able to stand, over the boys.  A generation gap?  Is it more painful to hear girls being musically "ugly" (so to speak) if you're a woman?  A disappointment?  A disillusionment?  And I guess it is more typical for boys to be screaming in rage than girls (in music).  You could probably do a whole big analysis comparing this to the use of the disembodied female voice in cinema - the female scream (in terror as she is about to be killed, or in witnessing a murder) is frequently used, but the disembodied female voice is never in control, never authoritative unless she is a villainess.  When she screams it's in fear, never rage.  But that's part of the reason I really like it when female artists cover male songs, especially songs that are stereotypically male - grunge and metal and pissed. 

"this is a song that kurt wrote... we can't do it very well, but we'll try... maybe he can hear it, and he'll go, you know you really fucked up my song, courtney, don't even try it... but if it works..."
intertribal: (artificial sweetener)
Susan Faludi's Terror Dream:

Ms. Faludi, a Pulitzer Prize-winning reporter and the author of two previous books, was perplexed by the cultural fallout from that day. What she found, she says, was a powerful resurgence in traditional sex roles and a glorification of he-man virility as embodied by Wayne, the ur-savior of virtuous but helpless damsels in distress. The prefeminist thinking was everywhere, Ms. Faludi said: in the media, where female commentators were suddenly scarce after 9/11 and specious trend reports appeared about women nesting and baking; in depictions of that day’s heroes as male and victims as female; and in movies like the 2005 “War of the Worlds,” Ms. Faludi said, with Tom Cruise as a “deadbeat divorced dad emasculated by his wife, reclaiming his manhood by saving their little girl.”

At the end of that movie, Mr. Cruise’s character cradles his daughter in his arms, an echo of the final scene in John Ford’s classic 1956 film “The Searchers,” when John Wayne carries home his young niece, who was captured by Indians years before. “It’s some bizarre, weirdly out-of-proportion fixation,” Ms. Faludi said, “an exaltation of American masculinity in an intergalactic crisis.”

Those who did not conform to this story line, she added — like female rescuers on 9/11 and widows who refused to remain piously grief-stricken or who scrutinized intelligence failures — were treated with contempt.

intertribal: (Default)
By [profile] babyjin, posted in [community profile] fanficrants.
The thread that follows is interesting too, although everyone agrees with her (thank God) - i.e., "oh, and a small message to those who bash/kill/otherwise get rid of a female character because she "gets in the way of the mansex": here's a tip - if you have to get rid of a female 'cause otherwise the two guys wouldn't go after each other, maybe they're not actually gay."  Apparently she was writing it about the Yu Yu Hakusho fandom, but I could have sworn it was mine. 
intertribal: (Default)

"I don't want to be a product of my environment."

THE DEPARTED:  *spoilers*  When I told my mother I had seen The Departed, she responded, "What's that movie about?"  I said, "It won the Oscar."  She looked at me as if that told her nothing - and indeed, given every year's oscar picks, it really doesn't.  I elaborated, "It's a mob movie.  There's the mob and the police and they each have informants."  She added, "Yeah, and it had a lot of big names in it?"  I nodded.  "Jack Nicholson is the mob boss, Leonardo diCaprio is the informant for the police, Brad Pitt is the informant for the mob, and they're in each other's corners, so it's like cat and mouse."  "Tense?" my mother asked.  "Yeah.  And lots of... bang bang."  "Shoot 'em up."  "Yeah." 

This of course is an extremely simplistic explanation of The Departed.  However, there are a few things I must get across before I get any further with this review.  I don't believe that The Departed has a message.  There's no parable, no moral to the story, no allegory, no step toward greater understanding of the state and purpose of humanity.  It's just a damn good movie, and that's all.  It's not a popcorn movie either.  It's too suspenseful, too nervous, too jumpy, too anxious, too in need of the Valium that DiCaprio's character craves, for that.  This is much more along the lines of the old movies that Scorcese never won the Oscar for - Raging Bull, Goodfellas, Gangs of New York, The Aviator (not so much The Last Temptation of Christ).  The only message in this movie, if any, is that as Nicholson says, you can be cops or robbers, but when you're staring at a barrel of a gun, it doesn't matter.  A better one, actually, comes from the Pakistani proprietor who watches a Bostonian mobster beat up two Providence mobsters in his store for insulting Irishmen - "What's wrong with this fucking country?  Everybody hates everybody!"

The theme is lying.  Everyone lies.  And you must always, always assume - if survival is your goal - that whoever you're talking to is lying, and further, that they have something planned.  I won't go into the plot of the movie, which is too long and which you can look up on wikipedia.  I'll just say a few things.  First, all the acting is excellent.  The most likable character is hands down Leonardo DiCaprio's (listed first on the credits, this is first and foremost his movie, and he is excellent... after this and Blood Diamond, he's steadily rising on my list of favorite actors), and the most dislikable character is hands down Matt Damon's - ironic since they are foils for each other, and DiCaprio is the one living the shady life as the undercover officer, having to participate in mass murders and all, whereas Damon is living the life of Mr. Perfect - except that of course he's actually a rat for the mob - and plays a role very similar to the one he played in The Good Shepherd - the pinstriped prick.  The twisted allegiances make it extremely hard to root for either the corrupt, uncommunicative, and yet determined, police or the immoral, backstabbing, and yet sympathetic mob.  And I think it's supposed to be that way - I think if we ended up taking sides and making proclamations about good and evil (except that they're blurred), the movie would fail, and that serves as evidence of the actors' aptitude in their roles, even the ones I couldn't stand. 

Which brings me to the second thing I have to say - Jack Nicholson is absolutely excellent as the evil mob boss.  He's king of political incorrectness, speaking of "Guineas" and "cunts" and threatening horrendous deeds without flinching, but of course Nicholson has a way of being charming even when he's being sadistic.  He is also the father figure for both DiCaprio and Damon.  And what a twisted father he is.  But so, then, are they twisted sons.  This is sort of a Hobbesian movie in that sense - these men are savage men, living without commitments or real relationships, to even each other.  The most important thing is the ego - not only in the sense of macho, cock-wielding bravado, but in the sense of ego = I am.  As in, I have a sense, a self, an identity, inalienable rights that come with my soul.  Sometimes it seems they really just spend the whole movie trying to reach that.  As DiCaprio keeps demanding, "I just want my identity back." 

Finally, I lied.   I did take sides.  I hoped Damon would die, and I hoped DiCaprio would live.  There, I said it.  And yes, I'm telling the truth.  I said it was fucking true.  Let's just say that I was compromised, but that in a movie like this, you couldn't expect anything less, or more, than compromise - because the way the world works, it's like a business deal.  You win some, you lose some.  Good people die, and bad people die.  Everything dies.  Oh yeah, I lied again.  This movie does have something to say, and that's what it is - everything dies.  As Nicholson says in all his wisdom, we're all on our way out: act accordingly.  Somehow this message doesn't end up being all that depressing - it just makes you feel like karma has won out, with a bullet.  The balance between good and evil, with neither side winning, continues.  The slate is wiped clean.  Both boys wish that they could start over, because they see that they can't have their selves back: they may as well just get a new self entirely, not a muddled, puzzled self stuck between two or three existences.  They realize this when they're about to die, when they've lost everything: please, let me start over.  But well, they don't get to in life.  Hopefully they believe in reincarnation.  It's still a damn good movie.  Will it change your life?  Probably not.  But it's a hell of a good way to spend two and a half hours. - Highly Recommended.


nota bene:  I'm slightly disturbed that KM, head of our department, disliked this movie so much because it was so mindlessly violent.  I wonder if AC felt the same way... and perhaps I should just avoid KM, who is apparently also a republican.

Profile

intertribal: (Default)
intertribal

December 2017

S M T W T F S
     12
34567 89
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31      

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 3rd, 2025 07:19 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios