intertribal: (crashing his head against the locker)
You know this is the official photo of Cheney that hung in U.S. embassies and consulates worldwide? 


Dude needs like, plastic surgery.  Either that or it's a classic case of "then your face caught up with your psychology."  He's still rattling on about how Obama has made us less safe by making counterterrorism a police matter.  Hey, Cheney!  Indonesia made counterterrorism a police matter and they've like, executed their Osama Bin Ladens.  What has our militarization of counterterrorism brought us?  Where's our Bin Laden?

Radio silence. 

No, Cheney - what the military guarantees is a war. 

On the domestic front, the New York Times really has found itself a new crusade.

I'm sorry, journalism.  I guess watching your reaction to Timor jaded the shit out of me:

1975 = say what?  Timor?  you mean the killing fields of Cambodia?  we have a special on that!
1975-1991 = radio silence
1992 = EAST TIMOR IS AN OUTRAGE OF THE GREATEST KIND
intertribal: (hold still you fuck)
All I have to say is oh my GOD.

what's next, forced labor -> forced combat?

I think this is the best part, though: "also open to students and refugees".

also, this is why I'm a left-wing conspiracy nut, as my speech coach once called me: "Recruiters’ work became easier in the last few months as unemployment soared and more Americans sought to join the military."  Read Johnson's "American Militarism and Blowback: The Costs of Letting the Pentagon Dominate Foreign Policy".  Read it and cry.
intertribal: (Default)
NYT: Soldier With Mental History Suspected in Attacks

A Fort Carson soldier and war veteran charged in the murder and sexual assault of a woman in Colorado last month faces accusations that he also raped a 14-year-old girl and sexually assaulted a third woman, an internal Army document states.

The document, the Commander’s Report on the suspect, Specialist Robert H. Marko, also raises serious questions about his mental state during his time at Fort Carson beginning in late 2006 and whether he should have deployed to Iraq in 2007.

It was common knowledge among his commanding officers and fellow soldiers, the document states, that Specialist Marko, who is being held without bond, believed he was an “alien dinosaur-like creature, and that he would transform from his human form into his Black Raptor form on his 21st birthday — 13 Oct 08.”

He told his superiors that he had joined the Army to “get combat experience — something that he viewed as important to his Black Raptor identity.”

Specialist Marko’s MySpace page was replete with his dark impulses. “I’m becoming a true Black Raptor already,” he wrote in his profile. “I’m becoming a cold-hearted killer and can kill without mercy or reason.”

After joining the Army, his “unusual beliefs” in his Black Raptor alter-ego resulted in him being referred for psychiatric evaluations three times. Ultimately, the beliefs came to be viewed by his mental health evaluators as a religion, of sorts, like Wicca.
intertribal: (east indian girl)
I don't know what got into the NY Times' editorial board today. It's truly hilarious that Americans think the U.S. military is like, "critically ill-equipped". Guys: we are really, really not.  We have the most powerful military in the world.  We have the best equipment in the world.  That is part of the quagmire.  That is why it's a quagmire.  Adding troops or money is not going to solve Iraq (just like it didn't solve Vietnam, natch!) - inadequate preparation, or God help us, too small of a force, is really not our problem.

Is this like a particularly Democratic thing? Because Democrats seem to have this fixation with wanting to protect "our boys" over yonder - bring them home, give them more shields, etc. I suppose Republicans want to spend money on missile defense shields and Democrats want to spend money on armor.

Too bad nobody wants to just cut military spending, period. Too bad nobody thinks maybe we should close some of our hundreds of bases and put more effort into building diplomatic relations instead of mil-to-mil relations, especially with countries that are trying to wean themselves off military dictatorships. Too bad nobody thinks maybe the way to fight terrorism isn't through more terrorism, just like fighting guerrilla style didn't do a whole lot against the Viet Cong. Too bad nobody listened to Wayne Wilcox, who's dead now.

"American military power, while formidable beyond belief, cannot always produce intended results because it cannot influence the dead. The willingness of people under siege – London in the Battle of Britain, Stalingrad, Bastogne, the Japanese at Iwo Jima, and let it be said, the North Vietnamese – to sacrifice all is quite as impressive as advanced weaponry… how hard small states die and how easily they are reborn, vigorous as before." (1967)

Too goddamn bad.
intertribal: (Default)

Am I one of them?

28 WEEKS LATER - Let me first say, before I go any further, that this is the most violent, depressing, and frightening movie I have ever seen.  Maybe my view is skewed by the fact that I saw it alone in a theater with two other people, but I have never been more horrified in my life.  It was ten times more frightening than 28 Days Later, and I will tell you why.  There were certain topics that 28 Days Later shied from showing.  Some characters would say that they watched their parents turn into Infected, but it would not appear, not even in a flashback.  And when Hannah's father turns into an Infected in front of her, he's shot dead quickly by the army before anything nasty can happen.  28 Weeks Later shows family members turning Infected, and unlike the efficient survivalist team of Serena, Jim, and Hannah, the Infected are not immediately and mercifully put down.  They're allowed to destroy - their children, their spouses - all shown with unflinching blood and gore.  That is the most harrowing part of this movie.  The destruction in this movie is also on a much grander scale, partly because the United States, in its Reconstruction gear, has arrived to put London back on its feet.  The movie tag line - "Maintain the Quarantine - Deadly Force Will Be Used to Protect this Area" - is dogma for this military.

The New York Times astutely pointed out the hidden political allegory here - the safe area called "The Green Zone", and of course "we had to destroy the country in order to save it" - it seems that this movie shows what would happen if a zombie attack occurred during the Homeland Security era.  District 1, the Green Zone, is bombarded with bullets, fire, and chemicals after chaos breaks down, and yet it is unsuccessful - the "biological terrorists" (because that's really what the Infected are in this movie) slip through the cracks and propagate.  I think that the Orlando Sentinel's claim that this movie promotes genocide (because, presumably, not enough deadly force is used, and this enables the Infected to survive?) is a little amusing given that I think anyone who knows anything about security studies knows that the U.S. military in the movie acted exactly how the U.S. military would, with all reason on their side, react if confronted with this kind of an outbreak - we've lost control: kill everyone - be they visibly Infected or not.  It may be genocide, but I think it's also standard operating procedure.  It's surrealist in that sense.  No, it doesn't make sense in the movie, but if you look at it from the perspective of a military trying to contain an extremely contagious virus that has the capacity to wipe out entire populations... "genocide" is rational, isn't it?  It does make sense.  Right? 

This movie is very, very different from its predecessor.  It starts off quite similarly, using the cinema verite and all, but that fades as it becomes a slicker, crisper picture with much more grandiose special effects - it makes sense, actually, because this is what I would like to call an "Independence Day" movie, not a "Signs" movie.  You see, I separate action/sci fi/horror movies into those two groupings - the "Independence Day" types focus on the decisions of the people in power and cover large casts and many locations.  The focus tends to be systemic breakdown or systemic success, with the actions of individuals serving as wild cards that the system may or may not be able to accommodate.  Examples include: Independence Day, Jurassic Park, Men in Black, 28 Weeks Later, Kairo, Mars Attacks.  "Signs" types focus on the decisions of a small group of regular joes and janes and follow their efforts to understand a phenomenon that is usually not explained or analyzed.  The focus tends to be on individual survival, on emotions, on psychology.  Examples include: Signs, Shaun of the Dead, 28 Days Later, Alien and Aliens, The Hills Have Eyes, the Descent.  So yes, 28 Weeks Later operates on a bigger scale, with bigger machines. 

The scenes of an empty London remain beautiful in an awful way, however, and the characters of the two children orphaned by Rage who carry a genetic "immunity" of sorts to it were quite poignant, all the more so because they were children, and they don't understand or care about the system or "the greater good".  The system fails because of them, but if the system can't tolerate wild cards that they themselves introduce into the mix, then the system fails overall. 

It is a colder, harsher movie.  There's no time to wonder what Rage really is in an artistic sense the way there was in 28 Days Later.  There's only time to run, and not enough time for that.  The devastation comes because you are still allowed to get close to the characters, but they cannot be saved.  28 Days Later is uplifting in comparison - there people's actions can matter, and "it's not all fucked".  Here, one character even says, "It's all fucked, that's what they keep saying, it's all fucked".  I see why The Journal Star and The Orlando Sentinel were not fans of it, and dismissed it as a gore-fest.  No, no.  Hatchet is a gore fest.  28 Weeks Later is massively apocalyptic and nihilistic.  It's about breakdown, not survival.  And if that's your thing (it is mine, but I'm obsessed with systems), this movie will prove extremely interesting. 

At one point in the novel The Lost World, a character suggests that perhaps mankind is a plague designed to wipe the Earth clean.  And I've heard environmentalists and writers discuss the probability of a real plague being the tool of our extinction.  The religious among us might wonder why - would Earth create a disease to kill us all?  Or God?  And why?  In 28 Weeks Later, when Code Red (the kill everything moving command) is initiated, one of the gunmen on the roof fires indiscriminately as he's told and then stops and wipes his eyes, saying, "fuck, fuck, fuck."  There's an incredible disjuncture in this movie between the emotional capacity of humans as sensitive biological beings and the technological capacity we have to create widespread destruction and death.  Maybe we can't handle that kind of power, and maybe we're not supposed to be able to.  It is ironic that Rage, the virus, was created by exposing monkeys to violence, and that even the awesome annihilating violence of the military is unable to wipe out Rage.  Maybe we're going to wipe the Earth clean of ourselves.  Maybe our brains got too big, and our mitochondria are subtly realigning our DNA to create maximum vulnerability to a contagious, deadly virus.  - Highly Recommended. 

Profile

intertribal: (Default)
intertribal

December 2017

S M T W T F S
     12
34567 89
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31      

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 21st, 2025 08:09 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios