women in horror, the legend continues
Jun. 22nd, 2010 11:19 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
This is a 2007 video that
sockkpuppett (Luminosity) and
sisabet made for Vividcon - the theme is the depiction of women in Supernatural, and the song they used is "Violet" by Hole (which should tell you in what direction the video's going). It's extremely graphic - but of course this was all on the CW - and potentially triggery. It's called "Women's Work."
As I don't watch Supernatural, I defer to
cofax7 for some extra words: "I've been aware for the entire time I've watched the show that there were problems with the presentation of women, but this vid really provides the ammunition for that argument. Because even if the male deaths total the same number (which I don't know), the fact is that they are filmed entirely differently: they are clothed, the camera doesn't linger on them, they're not swimming, in bed, in bedclothes, bathing. Women in peril are sexy, and in a different way than the Winchesters in peril. Dean on his knees is sexy not because he is in peril, but because we know he's going to get up and kick ass in just a moment, because the show has identified him as the Hero. Whereas none of the women have that protection in the text." More commentary on
sisabet's LJ here.
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
As I don't watch Supernatural, I defer to
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
no subject
Date: 2010-06-22 06:12 pm (UTC)It's interesting, this show and Lost come up in my head a lot about how TV interacts with the notion of God, and in both shows, it seems that the producers and writers think that God is a man, not masculine in aspect, but a may-uhn, and that, as I judge them, he's kind of a shitty man.
There is a part of me that really wants to interact with that trope somehow, in some form of fiction or game design - the posable/disposable way women get treated in horror (especially in horror).
no subject
Date: 2010-06-22 07:10 pm (UTC)The thing is, it's a very tricky thing to even interact with b/c of the very nature of the problem.
no subject
Date: 2010-06-22 08:23 pm (UTC)Sexualization of female fear and death is part of "mainstream" horror iconography--we all know this. Questioning it is worthwhile. Widening the scope is worthwhile (why not do the same to dudes?), as is narrowing it (why sexualize any fear and death, when in RL both fear and death are very unsexy things?). And yet...
And yet: I still like Supernatural, so I guess I'm complicit, and I should just accept it. Yeah. That's probably the best way to go (aside from worth on those sequels to "Crossing the River").
no subject
Date: 2010-06-22 08:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-22 08:46 pm (UTC)One of the things that the creators said, actually, was that you could use many TV shows as the source and achieve something similar. And I think what's problematic is the jump to "depiction of women dying is bad!" I don't think that jump is necessary. But it did get me thinking about things I've written or plan to write, and whether distribution of depiction of suffering is fair across the genders, all things considered. 1) And there are a lot of things to consider. 2) And the creator's self-awareness, I think, is huge.
no subject
Date: 2010-06-22 09:02 pm (UTC)As for male deaths on Supernatural, you'd probably almost immediately run into the parallel problem of POC getting killed...though I guess that's a whole 'nother issue.
no subject
Date: 2010-06-22 09:15 pm (UTC)Oh dear.
no subject
Date: 2010-06-22 11:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-22 11:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-22 11:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-22 08:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-23 02:13 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-23 03:26 am (UTC)like this maybe?
Date: 2010-06-23 03:39 am (UTC)Re: like this maybe?
Date: 2010-06-23 03:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-23 02:23 am (UTC)I have to confess that threat and violence--IN STORIES--can be pretty much of a turn-on for me, depending on the story. And I haven't analyzed myself enough to know what details of the story make it a turn-on and what ones make it a turn-off.
So: I know it's bad that it's always done to women, etc. But I guess I'm just humbly stating the obvious and saying that there are plenty of complicit women viewers/readers. LIke myself, in some instances. Certainly doesn't mean it's all that I want in my entertainment, or even most of what I want in my entertainment, just saying that a little of that, I don't mind. But clearly people's mileage varies WILDLY. And it's certainly the root of a lot of problems.
no subject
Date: 2010-06-23 03:24 am (UTC)Oh, I totally agree. If there's no sense of physical danger I very, very often cannot get into a story at all. There is a certain kind of story that's a turn-off - the first person serial killer story that lovingly describes the deaths (I've never read this done well, only creepy and amateur. sometimes in 2nd person, as in, "you try to scream but...").
And what's interesting is that Supernatural has a huge female following. The depiction of violence against women is not a dealbreaker (that would be ridiculous), but when it becomes a theme, I definitely want to see that the creator is aware of what they're doing, and why. I do think that the whole "women's deaths filmed differently versus men's deaths" issue is interesting, and more of a problem. One of the things that one of the vid's creators said was something akin to "Daddy just falls down dead but Mommy burns on the ceiling."
no subject
Date: 2010-06-23 03:28 am (UTC)LOL. "So like a woman! No restraint! Always making a scene!" :-P
I've never actually seen Supernatural. And YES, I hate first-person serial killer stories.
no subject
Date: 2010-06-23 03:35 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-23 03:01 pm (UTC)