Bourdieu would probably also say (in a much more complex and convoluted way than i'm about to, and so possibly i'll get it wrong) that the objectivist standpoint is in fact a way of perceiving the world that is itself grounded in a certain social position--one of power and dominance or at least leisure, where indeed the social world can seem to be a representation or performance, and social actors acting out roles, and many symbolic interactions occur, whereas when you are under the force of this structure, you react, you don't have the leisure to observe and reflect, that's a form of wealth, for better or worse...this is part of his argument i'm leaving out and one he returns to later in his life.